Title page
Not included in the word count when used for its proper report purpose.
IB Geography • Internal Assessment
A six-stage route from raw field evidence to a concise, analytical Geography IA. The original AdornGeo report rules, mapping tools, visual-design resources and referencing guidance are restored here at the point students need them.
Students produce one report of their investigation. The report must not exceed 2,500 words, and its emphasis must be analytical rather than descriptive.
Original AdornGeo guidance and tools restored • resources surfaced within a student writing sequence • legacy address preserved
The report should read as one geographic argument: a focused question leads to a justified method; the method produces information; the information is presented and analysed; the analysis supports a conclusion; and the investigation is evaluated. Use the suggested word distribution as a planning guide, not a set of compulsory section limits.
| Criterion | Report section | Marks | Guide | Its job in the investigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Fieldwork question & geographic context | 3 | ≈ 300 words | State a focused question, connect it to the syllabus and locate the investigation precisely. |
| B | Method(s) of investigation | 3 | ≈ 300 words | Explain and justify how primary information was collected, including sampling. |
| C | Quality & treatment of information | 6 | ≈ 500 words | Present sufficient, relevant evidence using appropriate geographic techniques. |
| D | Written analysis | 8 | ≈ 850 words | Interpret patterns, relationships and anomalies, supported by evidence and geographic understanding. |
| E | Conclusion | 2 | ≈ 200 words | Answer the fieldwork question using the evidence already analysed. |
| F | Evaluation | 3 | ≈ 300 words | Evaluate method and evidence, then propose realistic, specific improvements. |
All main text counts, including the research question, analysis, conclusion and evaluation. An annotation longer than 10 words and a footnote longer than 15 words also count.
Not included in the word count when used for its proper report purpose.
Not included in the word count when used for its proper report purpose.
Not included in the word count when used for its proper report purpose.
Not included in the word count when used for its proper report purpose.
Not included in the word count when used for its proper report purpose.
Not included in the word count when used for its proper report purpose.
Not included in the word count when used for its proper report purpose.
Not included in the word count when used for its proper report purpose.
Not included in the word count when used for its proper report purpose.
Not included in the word count when used for its proper report purpose.
Not included in the word count when used for its proper report purpose.
Appendices should be used very sparingly. They may contain representative raw data or calculations, but they are not a place for analysis, secondary information or figures essential to the argument. Put a section word count at the end of each main section and the total on the front cover.
A map should do analytical work: locate the study, show the sampling pattern or make a spatial relationship visible. A decorative screenshot is not enough.
Move from a broad location map to a detailed study-area map. Mark sites, transects, access routes and relevant physical or human features. Then use a thematic map when the spatial pattern itself forms part of the analysis.
Choose a technique because it reveals something useful about the fieldwork question. Then interpret the resulting pattern with precise evidence.
Avoid a sequence of graph descriptions. Synthesis earns its place when two or more sources are compared: for example, an environmental-quality score supported by a located photograph and tested against visitor counts.
Visual polish should improve geographic communication. Use colour, icons and annotation consistently, but never allow design to obscure scale, data or source.
Use Piktochart to assemble a concise visual explanation, hierarchy or comparison. Keep the underlying numbers readable and cite the source.
Use Pixlr or GIMP to crop, straighten and clarify photographs. Do not alter evidence or remove features that change its meaning.
Use Noun Project symbols to build a consistent map key or flow diagram, with attribution when the licence requires it.
Test every figure against the same rule: it must be legible, purposeful, integrated and discussed in the report.
Answer the exact fieldwork question. Summarise the most convincing evidence, acknowledge important anomalies and avoid introducing new results or theory.
Judge how particular limitations affected the reliability, validity or representativeness of the findings. Match each weakness to a realistic improvement and explain how it would strengthen the evidence.
All secondary information must be referenced using a consistent author–date system. Include sources for background ideas, maps, data, images and adapted figures.